Curved balconies inspired by the twisting form of DNA jut
out over the central courtyard-like commons of the
University of South Dakota’s new Sanford School of Medicine
building.
The creativity used in the design of the building and
other environmentally-friendly structures like it in the
region are helping to break the cookie cutter mold and
create unique architecture that blends in with the natural
environment.
The green building movement has gained national
prominence and awareness, but it is still taking root in
North Dakota, South Dakota and western Minnesota. While the
general principles of sustainable design have been in use in
the region for decades, more local building projects are
incorporating green features into their designs.

Green components like geothermal heating and cooling
systems, the use of daylight and lighting controls, recycled
and locally-produced materials, native prairie grass
landscaping and storm water retention systems are only a
handful of the sustainable design elements being used in
building projects throughout the three-state region.
“It’s a design revolution,” said Stacey McMahan, a
principal and the green studio director with Koch Hazard
Architects in Sioux Falls, which designed the Sanford School
of Medicine building. “It’s changing the industry.”
Twenty five buildings in Minnesota, most of them in the
Minneapolis-St. Paul area, have attained Leadership in
Energy and Environmental Design certification, an
independent industry benchmark for green projects awarded by
the U.S. Green Building Council. North Dakota only has two
LEED certified projects, including the new Turtle Mountain
High School in Belcourt, ND, which recently received a LEED
Silver designation. No buildings in South Dakota have been
LEED certified yet.
But the region is starting to catch up. A total of 296
building projects in the three-state region had been
registered with the U.S. Green Building Council and were in
the planning stages or had started the process to become
LEED certified as of early last month. There are 40
prospective LEED certified buildings in South Dakota,
including the University of South Dakota’s new medical
school building, and 15 potential LEED certified projects in
North Dakota.
Great River Energy’s Maple Grove, MN, headquarters, which
includes a working wind turbine visible to passing motorists
on Interstate 94, is the first building in Minnesota and one
of only about 120 worldwide to earn LEED’s highest
designation, LEED Platinum certification.
“We’re a little more cautious in this part of the
country,” said Kevin Flynn, president and owner of EcoDEEP,
a St. Paul-based architecture and green building consulting
firm. “We’re not as fast to jump on the bandwagon, but we’re
getting there. A lot of people in the industry are becoming
more aware of the principles and are incorporating them into
their designs.”
GREEN GUIDELINES
The U.S. Green Building Council’s LEED ratings are based
on a points system for green building that awards projects
that have accumulated enough points to be designated LEED
Certified, Silver, Gold or Platinum.
The U.S. Green Building Council also offers training
programs for those in the building industry, allowing them
to become designated as LEED Accredited Professionals or
LEED APs.
Minnesota’s sustainable building standard — Buildings
Benchmarks and Beyond or B3 — which took effect in 2004, is
similar to LEED, but is more tailored to the climate and
building materials of the Northern Great Plains. Unlike
LEED, which offers a voluntary checklist to achieve
certification, B3 consists of a list of requirements that
must be met in the construction of all new state-funded
buildings. Starting next February, B3 requirements must also
be followed in all major renovations of state-funded
facilities in Minnesota.
Minnesota’s B3 standards will be updated to reflect a new
set of guidelines in development that are intended to
significantly reduce carbon dioxide emissions by lowering
energy use in new buildings and major renovation projects in
the state. The non-binding guidelines, which will be linked
to utility incentive programs, aim to reduce carbon
emissions by 60 percent in new buildings by 2010 and to make
future buildings in the state carbon neutral by 2030.
South Dakota’s state legislature passed new
high-efficiency energy standards last July requiring the
construction of all new state-owned buildings and major
renovations meet LEED Silver guidelines or comparable
sustainable building standards, although some projects can
be exempted.
The University of North Dakota and North Dakota State
University have taken sustainable design into consideration
more when planning new building projects on their campuses.
The University of Minnesota system is also in the process of
establishing requirements for new buildings, which will
include some environmental aspects.
“Green building will eventually just be the normal way of
doing business like the (Americans with Disabilities Act)
has changed the way buildings are built,” said Aaron Faiman,
a mechanical engineer and a LEED AP with Ulteig Engineers,
which has offices in Fargo, Bismarck, Sioux Falls, Detroit
Lakes, MN, Minneapolis and Denver. “It will just become the
normal way of putting up a building.”
MORE DEMAND
The value of green building construction starts in the
U.S. increased from $10 billion in 2005 to more than $36
billion last year and is projected to total between $96
billion and $140 billion by 2013, according to a recent
report by McGraw-Hill Construction.
What is driving the green building boom? Sustainable
building mandates, the influence of green standards like
LEED and Green Globe, and increased environmental awareness
have all played major roles. But for many businesses, the
decision to go green is as rooted in their bottom line as a
desire to save the planet.
A 2003 study performed for California governmental
agencies found that investments in green buildings were
repaid more than 10 times over.
Green building projects typically come with higher
up-front materials costs. The additional cost of completing
extra paperwork and documenting the building process while
pursuing LEED certification can also total $20,000 or more.
But Richard Graves, an architect with the Minneapolis office
of the Perkins + Will architecture firm and a U.S. Green
Building Council board member, said higher initial costs for
materials like insulation and windows are quickly offset by
smaller mechanical systems and cheaper operating expenses.
Graves said energy savings and other decreased costs often
pay off increased initial costs within three years. After
that, the building’s owners will enjoy decreased operating
expenses for the rest of the building’s lifetime.
“Owners are starting to get a broader sense of cost,”
said Graves, a LEED AP. “They are not just looking at first
costs. They are starting to look at operating expenses as
well.”
Flynn of the EcoDEEP green building consulting firm said
initial building costs might only represent 6 percent of the
total cost of a building during its 30-year lifespan, with
operations and maintenance making up the remaining 94
percent.
“One of the big myths out there is if you decide to go
green, its going to cost you more,” Flynn said. “That’s not
necessarily true. It doesn’t necessarily mean you’re going
to spend more on your building, it just means you’re going
to spend it differently.”
ENERGY SAVINGS
A report compiled by the New Buildings Institute for the
U.S. Green Building Council last year found that LEED
certified buildings studied used 25 percent to 30 percent
less energy on average than comparable commercial building
stock.
“Overall, sustainable design is always going to be
cheaper,” said Sean Ervin, a managing principal and LEED AP
with Sioux Falls-based architecture firm TSP Inc., which
also has offices in Rapid City, SD, Marshall, MN, Rochester,
MN, Minneapolis, Marshalltown, IA, Sheridan, WY, and Omaha,
NE. “It’s going to save maintenance costs and energy costs
in the long run.”
The new Urban Plains Center in Fargo is estimated to save
more than $100,000 in utility costs and up to 1 million
gallons of water a year.
The arena is the first phase of the $44 million Urban
Plains Center and Tournament Facility complex designed by
ICON Architectural Group, which has offices in Grand Forks,
ND, and Fargo, and developed by land owner Ace Brandt. The
arena, which is going through the LEED certification
process, incorporates geothermal well fields, motion-sensing
lighting controls, reflective EPDM roofing, recycled plastic
benches, counters and partitions, low-flow water reduction
fixtures and is the first project in the state to use
waterless urinals. The arena is part of a 330-acre master
development and is adjacent to a 24-acre central park design
that includes a 10-acre naturally-filtered pond.
JLG Architects, which has offices in Grand Forks, Fargo,
Alexandria, MN, and Minneapolis, installed a geothermal
heating and cooling system when it built a new school in
Erskine, MN, more than a decade ago. When finished, the
school’s heating and cooling costs for an entire year were
the same as how much it used to cost to heat the former
school for just the month of December. A second JLG
Architects school built in Clearbrook, MN, also equipped
with a geothermal heating and cooling system, has been
estimated to save about $100,000 in energy costs a year.
“We’ve always felt that sustainability is important,
mostly because of where we live,” said Lonnie Laffen, JLG’s
co-founder and a principal in the firm. “The buildings in
our climate use an enormous amount of energy compared to
other areas of the country because it gets so cold here. The
lowest cost we can make our buildings operate at and have
the least environmental impact, the better.”
CHANGING EXPECTATIONS
More clients in the region are asking architects about
green building and looking to make their buildings run more
efficiently.
“The expectations of clients are changing,” said Flynn,
whose consulting firm helped coordinate the LEED process for
the Turtle Mountain High School project. “Now when they are
asking for a building to be designed, they are asking for a
more sustainable design. They aren’t necessarily seeking
LEED certification, but they are looking for better
buildings.”
Marvin Windows and Doors executives chose to use green
building techniques in an office expansion project at the
company’s Warroad, MN, headquarters. The company will seek
LEED certification for the building project that will
include daylighting, lighting controls and the use of some
recycled and locally-produced building materials, cutting
down on shipping costs.
“We’ve always worked hard to do the right thing and make
the right choices in whatever we do,” said Susan Marvin, the
company’s president.
“We wanted to employ environmentally-friendly processes.
Usually what is good for the environment makes good business
sense over the long run anyway.”
Michael Burns, president and principal of Michael J.
Burns Architects of Moorhead, MN, said
environmentally-conscious college students are also pushing
universities to build more eco-friendly buildings. “They are
almost demanding that the universities provide a strong
sensitivity to it,” said Burns, whose firm designed a $10.6
million residence hall project that is slated to open on the
University of Minnesota, Crookston campus this fall and is
seeking LEED certification.
In addition to educational, governmental and office
buildings, current green building projects in the region
include health care and military facilities, a museum,
border crossing station and private homes. A new terminal
for the Grand Forks International Airport will use
low-emitting paint and carpet, a storm water retention
system and geothermal heating and cooling. The project,
which JLG Architects and Ulteig Engineers are currently
working on, will seek LEED Gold certification.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
Buildings account for 72 percent of the nation’s
electrical consumption, 39 percent of the country’s primary
energy use and 38 percent of all carbon dioxide emissions,
according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
Building construction also uses up 40 percent of the world’s
raw materials, according to a 1995 Worldwatch Institute
report.
Building better, more sustainable and efficient buildings
not only benefits the environment, it can also save energy
and conserve natural resources while reducing operating
costs.
“It is definitely becoming more and more mainstream to
think about sustainable design and the relationship with the
built environment,” said Ganapathy Mahalingam, interim chair
of North Dakota State University’s architecture and
landscape architecture department.
Green buildings have also been found to improve employee
productivity by creating a healthier and more stimulating
work environment.
“If you can make even a small increase in productivity in
your staff, that is an amazing return on investment,” said
Flynn of the EcoDEEP consulting firm.
GREEN IN THE MAINSTREAM
Environmentally-conscious building practices have entered
the mainstream and become more accepted, even in the
generally conservative Northern Great Plains.
“I started pushing hard on this 15 years ago and people
thought, 'Oh, he’s this tree hugger. What is he talking
about?’” said Flynn, who is based in St. Paul. “It’s not
that way anymore. Almost overnight people started saying,
‘This makes sense.’”
When asked about the change in perspective, Graves, an
architect with the Minneapolis office of Perkins + Will,
mentioned a recent TV commercial from IBM that depicts a
manager who is skeptical about a green proposal from an
employee. The manager says the plan might be popular with
tree huggers, but that the people he reports to don’t eat
granola — until he finds out the proposal could cut the
company’s energy costs by 40 percent.
“That’s what you are seeing in the industry now,” Graves
said. “It’s not just environmentalists. Green building is
seen as good business.”
JLG has a group within the company that focuses on
maintaining sustainability in the firm’s projects, offices
and the community.
“It is part of what we do in every design project,” said
Kevin Donnay, vice president and director of architecture of
Widseth Smith Nolting, an architecture, engineering,
surveying and environmental services firm with offices in
Baxter, MN, Bemidji, MN, Crookston, MN, Alexandria, MN,
Rochester, MN, Red Wing, MN, Grand Forks and Sioux Falls.
“It is just getting more emphasis now. We talk about it more
and push it more with our clients. Our clients are much more
aware of it now.”
Not all clients and architects have embraced the green
building movement, though.
It seems to me that there is not that much gray area,”
said Dennis Hulsing, a partner in the Bismarck-based
Ritterbush-Ellig-Hulsing architecture firm and the founder
of Hulsing & Associates Architects in Dickinson, ND. “They
are either really interested or they are totally
disinterested.”
Architects, engineers and industry insiders say that like
it or not, green building appears to be here to stay.
“I think this will become routine,” said JLG’s Laffen.
“It won’t be news and it won’t be unique. But it’s not going
away. It will just become an everyday practice.”